I read the most annoying article quoted by Eric Wittenberg, And I will quote in full, FYI
Drastic Expansion of Mining Operations Threatens Belle Grove Plantation and Cedar Creek Civil War Battlefield
Blasting, Quarry Truck Traffic, Noise and Multi-Story High Waste Piles Will Alter Historic and Rural Gem of the Shenandoah ValleyWashington, DC - June 18, 2008 - The National Trust for Historic Preservation today reaffirmed its strong opposition to radically expanded mining operations proposed in and around Cedar Creek & Belle Grove National Historical Park. Cedar Creek and Belle Grove are situated in a rural landscape whose centuries of historical and cultural significance include 18th century Shenandoah Valley settlements, 18th-19th century plantation lands and Civil War battle grounds. The Belgian mining conglomerate Carmeuse Lime & Stone has recently won county approval to move ahead with mining activities, including blasting and increased quarry truck traffic, which could destroy the character of the visitor experience at Belle Grove Plantation, a National Trust Historic Site and National Historic Landmark, and the Cedar Creek Civil War battlefield.
“The National Trust for Historic Preservation, which has owned Belle Grove Plantation for 44 years, is dismayed that intrusive mining activities could destroy the character of sites of tremendous national and regional significance,” said Richard Moe, president of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. “Preservation of these irreplaceable cultural landscapes and buildings, rich in our nation’s history, is one of the highest priorities of the National Trust for Historic Preservation, and we will do everything we can to protect them from irreparable harm.”
Recently, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, by a vote of 4-3, approved Carmeuse’s destructive proposal despite opposition from the National Trust for Historic Preservation, Belle Grove Inc., (which manages the plantation site), and a broad coalition of partners and local residents, alarmed that the quarry operations will destroy the tourism industry and their way of life. Experts agree expansion of the quarry will harm Belle Grove, which dates to the late 18th century, and the Cedar Creek battlefield, the region’s most significant Civil War site. Already, multi-story high mounds of mining waste are intruding on the site’s world-class vistas. Each year tens of thousands of visitors come to the area because of its history. Proposed blasting would damage historic structures, bulldozers would destroy acres of core battlefield land adjacent to the National Historical Park, and dust clouds, noise, and increased quarry truck traffic would diminish the visitor’s experience.
The threat is so severe, the Civil War Preservation Trust in 2007 and again in 2008 listed the Cedar Creek battlefield as one of America’s most-endangered Civil War battlefields. The National Trust for Historic Preservation and Belle Grove, Inc., longtime stewards of the 18th-19th century plantation and the Cedar Creek Civil War battlefield, fully intend to pursue avenues that will mitigate, reduce and avoid harm to Belle Grove, and the cultural and historic resources within and adjacent to the National Historical Park, but hope that congressional action can halt the mining expansion altogether.
As one signal of their opposition, the National Trust for Historic Preservation and Belle Grove, Inc. are suspending any involvement with the Cedar Creek Battlefield Foundation and prohibiting their use of Belle Grove for their annual Civil War re-enactment. Although the two non-profits recognize the value of Civil War commemorative activities, including re-enactments, as dynamic educational and tourism programming, they are suspending their relationship with the Cedar Creek Battlefield Foundation because of the Foundation’s sudden reversal on the mining issue. On April 17, the president and executive director of the Foundation assured the National Trust for Historic Preservation and Belle Grove of their opposition to quarry owner Carmeuse’s mining proposals. Yet on April 23, without notifying the National Trust for Historic Preservation or Belle Grove, the foundation publicly testified before the Frederick County Board of Supervisors they “took no exception” to the quarry expansion, essentially approving the proposal. On the same day, the Foundation struck a deal to accept a gift of 8 acres of land from the quarry owner. The Cedar Creek Battlefield Foundation’s conduct has undermined generations of work to protect the historic plantation and battlefield and has strained the public - private partnership that was established by Congress in 2002 to plan the future management of the National Historical Park.
“We certainly respect the Cedar Creek Battlefield Foundation’s past contributions to the stewardship of the battlefield. But we cannot silently and passively overlook the Foundation’s recent actions, which were taken unilaterally and without the prior knowledge of its partners in the overall preservation effort,” said Anne Buettner, president of Belle Grove, Inc.’s Board of Directors. “As a result, the National Trust for Historic Preservation and Belle Grove, Inc. cannot host the Foundation’s October 2008 re-enactment on Belle Grove lands, when they have taken actions that tend to undermine the efforts of their partners and that jeopardize the region’s treasured historic sites and Civil War heritage. Belle Grove and the National Trust will, as always, commemorate the anniversary of the 1864 Battle of Belle Grove or Cedar Creek with a weekend of special events, speakers and interpretive programs in the historic Manor House and on its lawns and surrounding fields, hosted separately from any other events.”
The National Trust for Historic Preservation is a non-profit membership organization bringing people together to protect, enhance and enjoy the places that matter to them… By saving the places where great moments from history - and the important moments of everyday life - took place, the National Trust for Historic Preservation helps revitalize neighborhoods and communities, spark economic development and promote environmental sustainability. With headquarters in Washington, DC, 9 regional and field offices, 29 historic sites, and partner organizations in all 50 states, the National Trust for Historic Preservation provides leadership, education, advocacy and resources to a national network of people, organizations and local communities committed to saving places, connecting us to our history and collectively shaping the future of America’s stories. For more information, visit www.PreservationNation.org
Its quite obvious that there was a huge amount of pressure on the foundation, and the free land offered in exchange is proof of that.
This whole sad story is so obviously profit oriented and lacks in any sort of values and respect that is painful to think where is the next place this is going to happen in the name of personal profit.
Profile
Subscribe








Sue - As in most things in life, this is not as it appears. My guess is that the Frederick County Board of Supervisors approved the expanded quarry operations because the County Sanitation Authority has spent (and I speculate here) 1/2 a million dollars getting it approved! Frederick County is out of water and the BOS continues to approve development, so be mad at the BOS, not the CCBF. The CCBF preservation agreement would have been enacted whether the quarry was rezoned or not. The agreement covers everything from viewshed issues, to an archeological survey, to the donation of artifacts, to the protection of land. A member of the National Park Service, when briefed on the agreement, said that every preservation aspect was covered. My guess is, those that opposed the rezoning — mostly home owner that built next to quarry land — are unhappy that they built next to a quarry. And the preservation groups are unhappy that they missed out on getting anything from the quarry. In announcing its joining of the litigation against Frederick County, the National Trust said that it never opposed the quarrying, it just needed to get its share of the pie.
I suggest, if you have any questions, call the CCBF at (540) 869-2064. Don’t speculate in the dark. Do your own homework. I’m sure you will be happy with the result.
hi everybody here!
I’m going to get a new wheels. Wish to have a luxury one, but don’t know for sure what to choose… Can somebody advise me smth?
May I suggest a Concorde Buggy? It has a body with low sides and sidebar suspension. Of course the Stanhope buggy is nice with its high seat and closed back. If you have little ones you may be better off with one having two sets of seats, called a double buggy.
Most buggies can be pulled with one horse, though two does provide more ‘horse power.’
I have tried to price the buggies for you, as well as the cost of a horse or two, but with the war going on it has proved difficult, what with the armies snatching up all the horse flesh. I wouldn’t be surprised if a million or more horses are killed in this war.
Now, I’m assuming you mean buggy or carriage when you say ‘new wheels.’ I may be mistaken, you may mean your own personal railroad car, though in these times perhaps consider making it iron-clad.
All things considered, maybe I’ve totally misinterpreted, and you indeed just want a set of ‘wheels.’ I’m sure, with the abundance of artillery carriages, ambulances, wagons and so forth needed that a set of new wheels should be fairly easy to come by. Good luck.
what?
who?